The following is a list of things you can do: The following recent articles have been identified by a bot as being possibly related to Iran: Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2021-04-07 20:07 (UTC). Add new page. [394], In January 2021, Iran told the IAEA that it would enrich uranium to 20%, as it had done before the JCPOA. In June 2009, in the immediate wake of the disputed Iranian presidential election, Iran initially agreed to a deal to relinquish its stockpile of low-enriched uranium in return for fuel for a medical research reactor, but then backed out of the deal. [185], In May 2010, the IAEA issued a report that Iran had declared production of over 2.5 metric tons of low-enriched uranium, which would be enough if further enriched to make two nuclear weapons, and that Iran has refused to answer inspectors’ questions on a variety of activities, including what the agency called the "possible military dimensions" of Iran's nuclear program. Iran later set up a bilateral cooperation on fuel cycle related issues with China, but China also agreed to drop most outstanding nuclear commerce with Iran, including the construction of the UF6 plant, due to US pressure. [113] In September 2005, IAEA Director General Mohammad ElBaradei reported that "most" highly enriched uranium traces found in Iran by agency inspectors came from imported centrifuge components, validating Iran's claim that the traces were due to contamination. Viable security for Iran can be attained only through inclusion and regional and global engagement.[441]. The Iran nuclear deal was designed to curb Iran's ability to produce nuclear weapons, in exchange for the removal of sanctions on Iran. It has been suggested that access may have been granted in an attempt to head off further sanctions.[143]. Iran signed an Additional Protocol on 18 December 2003, and agreed to act as if the protocol were in force, making the required reports to the IAEA and allowing the required access by IAEA inspectors, pending Iran's ratification of the Additional Protocol. [260], Following the November 2009 IAEA Board of Governors resolution demanding Iran immediately stop building its newly revealed nuclear facility and freeze uranium enrichment, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs avoided mentioning sanctions but indicated harsher measures were possible unless Iran compromised: "If Iran refuses to meet its obligations, then it will be responsible for its own growing isolation and the consequences." more. Iran denounced the resolution. US Likely to Change Stance on Iran, Lift Sanctions: Analyst. [134] In August 2007, Iran and the IAEA entered into an agreement on the modalities for resolving remaining outstanding issues,[135] and made progress in outstanding issues except for the question of "alleged studies" of weaponization by Iran. The two-day meetings were led by EU High Representative Catherine Ashton and Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili. "[128], Iran asserts that there is no legal basis for Iran's referral to the United Nations Security Council since the IAEA has not proven that previously undeclared activities had a relationship to a weapons program, and that all nuclear material in Iran (including material that may not have been declared) had been accounted for and had not been diverted to military purposes. They cite that as a key document in the study had since been proven to have been fraudulently altered, it put in doubt the entire collection. Iran has dropped India from the project citing funding delays There are possiblities that a multi-billion dollar deal with China influenced Iran's decision Iran has decided to move ahead with the construction of a railway line from Chabahar port to Zahedan without … [432] Rahman Bonad, Director of Arms Control Studies at the Center for Strategic Research at Tehran, has argued that demands to cease enrichment run counter to "all negotiations and discussions that led to the adoption of the NPT in the 1960s and the fundamental logic of striking a balance between the rights and obligations stipulated in the NPT. [301] On 1 August 2012, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta while in Israel said that the United States had "options," including military options, to prevent Iran from attaining a nuclear weapon, should diplomacy fail. Iranian officials shrugged off approval of the resolution by 25 members of the Board, but the US and its allies hinted at new UN sanctions if Iran remained defiant. After August 2019!) "The Iranians are obviously proceeding with their nuclear research; they are doing things that the International Atomic Energy Agency does not want them to do, the Security Council doesn't want them to do. 1 Appearance 2 Personality 3 History 4 Gallery Add a photo to this gallery Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. Tehran Housing, Iran [7] In November 2011, the IAEA reported credible evidence that Iran had been conducting experiments aimed at designing a nuclear bomb until 2003, and that research may have continued on a smaller scale after that time. Razing and removal of five other buildings or structures and the site perimeter fence. We're responsible for what we're doing, we're in control". [231][232][233] Polls in 2008 showed that the vast majority of Iranians want their country to develop nuclear energy, and 90 per cent of Iranians believe it is important (including 81 per cent very important) for Iran "to have a full fuel cycle nuclear program. The project was formed by Iranian Wikipedians on 18 March 2006. [438][439] A March 2008 poll of 30 nations found moderate support for allowing Iran to produce nuclear fuel for electricity alongside a full program of UN inspections.[440]. [263], Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on 1 December brushed aside the threat of UN sanctions over his country's failure to accept a UN-proposed deal on its nuclear program, stating that such a move by western nations would not hinder Iran's nuclear program. [378] Iran claims "the whole thing was a hoax". It will automatically add yourself to Category:WikiProject Iran members. "[151], On 11 February 2008, news reports stated that the IAEA report on Iran's compliance with the August 2007 work plan would be delayed over internal disagreements over the report's expected conclusions that the major issues had been resolved. Therefore, the report recommended that the United States should increase sanctions on Iran in order to curb its ability to develop weapon-grade uranium. The United States was opposed to the Modalities Agreement between Iran and the IAEA, and vehemently objected to it, accusing Iran of "manipulating" IAEA. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. [68] Iran's position was endorsed by the Non-Aligned Movement, which expressed concern about the potential monopolization of nuclear fuel production. On 24 November, Iran sought to amend the terms of its agreement with the EU to exclude a handful of the equipment from this deal for research work. Nogiran is one of the side characters of Kotonoha Project. [212], On 30 August, the IAEA released a report showing a major expansion of Iranian enrichment activities. The charges would carry a maximum of up to a year in jail for fifth-degree conspiracy and a maximum of four years for falsifying business records. Iran dismissed the IAEA's report on the possible military dimensions to its nuclear program as based on "unfounded allegations." The Iran-Pakistan pipeline emerged from a plan dating as far back as 1994 and once included India. The IAEA also was informed about Entec's largest department, for materials testing, which was responsible for UO2 pellet fuel fabrication and a chemical department whose goal was the conversion of U3O8 to nuclear grade UO2. [5], The IAEA immediately sought access to these facilities and further information and co-operation from Iran regarding its nuclear program. [225], Fordow, the nuclear facility near Qom, contains 16 cascades, equally divided between Unit 1 and Unit 2, with a total of 2,710 centrifuges. China and Iran are rumored to be finalizing a $400 billion deal which would deepen economic, political, and militarily ties between two of America's chief adversaries. {{User WikiProject Iran}} - for the user page of project members{{WikiProject Iran}} – to be added to the talk pages of all articles relating to Iran. If you would like to join the project, simply add your name to the list of participants. Currently under microscope: South Korea", "South Korea experimented with highly enriched uranium", "Using Enrichment Capacity to Estimate Iran's Breakout Potential", "Iran: U.S. [81][82] Though South Korea's case involved enriching uranium to levels near weapons grade,[83] the country itself voluntarily reported the isolated activity[84] and Goldschmidt has argued "political considerations also played a dominant role in the board's decision" to not make a formal finding of non-compliance. [308][309] It was reported on 17 June Iran's newly elected president Hassan Rohani had expressed readiness for bilateral talks with Washington, with conditions. Iran has declared it has a right to peaceful nuclear technology under the NPT, despite Security Council demands that it cease its nuclear enrichment. The project aims to significantly expand China's economic and political influence and has raised concerns in the United States. "It, quite clearly, I think, underscores that Iran does not need its own enrichment capability if its intentions, as it states, are for a peaceful nuclear program," he said. For example, its efforts at mining and converting uranium were announced on national radio,[245][246] and Iran also says that in consultation with the Agency and member states throughout the 1990s it underlined its plans to acquire, for exclusively peaceful purposes, fuel enrichment technology. Seyyed Hossein Mousavian. The actual resumption of the program coincided with the election of President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, and the appointment of Ali Larijani as the chief Iranian nuclear negotiator. According to the August 2007 "Modalities Agreement" between Iran and the IAEA, Iran had agreed to review and assess the "alleged studies" claims, as good faith gesture, "upon receiving all related documents. [278], IAEA officials complained in 2007 that most US intelligence shared with it to date about Iran's nuclear program proved to be inaccurate, and that none had led to significant discoveries inside Iran through that time.[279]. "[148], 15 November 2007, IAEA report found that on nine outstanding issues listed in the August 2007 workplan, including experiments on the P-2 centrifuge and work with uranium metals, "Iran's statements are consistent with ... information available to the agency," but it warned that its knowledge of Tehran's present atomic work was shrinking due to Iran's refusal to continue voluntarily implementing the Additional Protocol, as it had done in the past under the October 2003 Tehran agreement and the November 2004 Paris agreement. [132] This resolution followed a report from the IAEA that Iran had permitted inspections under its safeguards agreement but had not suspended its enrichment-related activities.[133]. Templates . Iran - Iran - Relief: A series of massive, heavily eroded mountain ranges surrounds Iran’s high interior basin. [265] The Associated Press noted that his comments reflected a determination in Iran to continue defying international pressure regarding its nuclear program. This "six months" clause was standard for implementation of all IAEA safeguards agreements until 1992, when the IAEA Board of Governors decided that facilities should be reported during the planning phase, even before construction began. However, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran's envoy to the IAEA, denied the contents of the presentation, saying that "merely having a photo from up there, a satellite imagery ... this is not the way the agency should do its professional job. [73][74] The United States has insisted that Iran must meet the demands of the UN Security Council to suspend its enrichment program. The IAEA responded with a strongly worded letter to then US House Intelligence Committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra, which labeled as "outrageous and dishonest" the report's allegation that an IAEA inspector was dismissed for violating a supposed IAEA policy against "telling the whole truth" about Iran and pointed out other factual errors, such as a claim that Iran had enriched "weapons-grade" uranium. If we had a problem like that we would have to report to the [35-nation IAEA governing] board ... That has not happened because this alleged event did not take place. "[357], Mohamed ElBaradei, former director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, wrote that "the only way to resolve the Iranian issue is to build trust. [297] Thomas Fingar, former Chairman of the National Intelligence Council until December 2008, said that the original 2007 National Intelligence Estimate on Iran "became contentious, in part, because the White House instructed the Intelligence Community to release an unclassified version of the report's key judgments but declined to take responsibility for ordering its release. [14] Iran has also announced that it is working on a new 360 megawatt Darkhovin Nuclear Power Plant, and that it will seek more medium-sized nuclear power plants and uranium mines in the future. "On the contrary, many of our successes, including access to the nuclear fuel cycle and producing of heavy water, have been achieved under sanctions. [146] In late October 2007, chief IAEA inspector Olli Heinonen described Iranian cooperation with the IAEA as "good," although much remained to be done. In 1975 Sweden's 10 per cent share in Eurodif went to Iran. For example, in paragraph 21, the IAEA report states: "Although the Agency had been shown the documents that led it to these conclusions, it was not in possession of the documents and was therefore unfortunately unable to make them available to Iran." [37] However, the US government "directly intervened" to discourage IAEA assistance in Iranian production of UO2 and UF6. [443], Historically, until its own nuclear program began development, Iran had consistently supported the creation of a nuclear-weapons free zone in the Middle East. [147], In late October 2007, according to the International Herald Tribune, the head of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei, stated that he had seen "no evidence" of Iran developing nuclear weapons.